FRED MEYER, INC., ET AL.
v.
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION; FEIN V. NEW YORK; MAGNUS V. UNITED STATES; CURTIS ET AL. V. BOEGER, WARDEN; GRAND ET AL. V. BOEGER, WARDEN; BENNETT V. NORTH CAROLINA; CLEMONS V. UNITED STATES; MCCREARY V. WILSON, WARDEN; SKOLNICK V. PARSONS, U. S. DISTRICT; PIERSON V. NEW JERSEY; LEE V. KANSAS
FRED MEYER, INC., ET AL.
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION; FEIN V. NEW YORK; MAGNUS V. UNITED STATES; CURTIS ET AL. V. BOEGER, WARDEN; GRAND ET AL. V. BOEGER, WARDEN; BENNETT V. NORTH CAROLINA; CLEMONS V. UNITED STATES; MCCREARY V. WILSON, WARDEN; SKOLNICK V. PARSONS, U. S. DISTRICT; PIERSON V. NEW JERSEY; LEE V. KANSAS
386 U.S. 978
Supreme Court of the United States (1967)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Bennett v. United States, 426 F.2d 793 (4th Cir. 1970)…applicable law1 we dismissed the appeal as moot as a consequence of his release from custody. Bennett v. North Carolina, No. 10,891, mem. dec. (4 Cir., September 16, 1966), cert. denied 385 U.S. 1018, 87 S.Ct. 744, 17 L.Ed.2d 555 (1967), reh. denied 386 U.S. 978, 87 S.Ct. 1168, 18 L.Ed.2d 141 (1967). Subsequently Bennett filed an additional petition in which he alleged that his release from custody was not unconditional and that the case was not moot, further alleging that various persons had falsified and…