CHAPMAN ET AL.

v.

CALIFORNIA; BETHLEHEM STEEL CO. ET AL. V. UNITED STATES; CAPUCHINO V. TEXAS; POHLABEL V. UNITED STATES; MILANI V. ILLINOIS; MACDONALD V. CALIFORNIA; BOTSCH V. UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Hunt, 548 F.2d 268 (9th Cir. 1977)
  …g in the trunk. We are convinced beyond a reasonable doubt that the twelve packets of heroin disclosed by the search did not contribute to appellant’s conviction; the independent, untainted evidence of guilt was overwhelming. Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 987, 87 S.Ct. 1283, 18 L.Ed.2d 241 (1967). Direct evidence established appellant as the moving figure in the importation scheme before the shipment was intercepted at the airport and the contraband discovered. Proof of the subsequent events confirmed h…
• United States v. Spaulding, 588 F.2d 669 (9th Cir. 1978)
  …funds for the appointment of the experts before trial. U.S. v. Sanders, 459 F. 2d 1001 (9th Cir. 1972). We therefore hold this to have been harmless error under Chapman v. State of California, 386 U.S. 18, 87 S.Ct. 824, 17 L.Ed.2d 705, reh. denied, 386 U.S. 987, 87 S.Ct. 1283, 18 L.Ed.2d 241 (1967). Appellant complains of admission of evidence that a loaded, cocked .45 automatic was found under his pillow at the time of his arrest. The trial court later sustained an objection to the introduction into evid…
• Murphy v. S.W. Puckett, 893 F.2d 94 (5th Cir. 1990)
  …n first to the state’s argument that even though Murphy has demonstrated that his counsel was ineffective under the Strickland standard, that violation is harmless under Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18, 87 S.Ct. 824, 17 L.Ed.2d 705 reh’g. denied, 386 U.S. 987, 87 S.Ct. 1283, 18 L.Ed.2d 241 (1967). The Court in Chapman established that not all trial errors which potentially affect constitutional rights require reversal of a defendant’s conviction. “[S]ome constitutional errors ... in the setting of a part…