TAYLOR

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Porter, 764 F.2d 1 (1st Cir. 1985)
  …dant has no right to confront an informant who provides no evidence at trial. United States v. Francesco, 725 F. 2d 817, 822 (1st Cir.1984); Cooper v. State of Cal., 386 U.S. 58, 62, n. 2, 87 S.Ct. 788, 791, n. 2, 17 L.Ed.2d 730 (1967), reh. denied, 386 U.S. 988, 87 S.Ct. 1283, 18 L.Ed.2d 243 (1967). The limited information alleged by Baker to have been provided by the government about the incentives offered to the informant5 did not in any way infringe appellant’s right to confront the informant since he…
• ST. Luke's Hosp. v. Sec'y OF Health & Human Servs., 810 F.2d 325 (1st Cir. 1987)
  …matters despite a failure to have raised them before the agency. E.g., Walker v. Southern Ry. Co., 385 U.S. 196, 87 S.Ct. 365, 17 L.Ed.2d 294 (1966) (exhaustion not required due to excessive backlog in agency proceedings), modified on other grounds, 386 U.S. 988, 87 S.Ct. 1300, 18 L.Ed.2d 332 (1967); Leedom v. Kyne, 358 U.S. 184, 79 S.Ct. 180, 3 L.Ed.2d 210 (1958) (exhaustion not required where agency action clearly unlawful); Etelson v. Office of Personnel Management, 684 F. 2d 918, 923-26 (D.C. Cir.1982)…
• United States v. Jones, 452 F.2d 884 (8th Cir. 1971)
  …in circumstances not justifying the warrantless search of a private residence, office or other stationary property. In Cooper v. California, 1967, 386 U.S. 58, at page 59, 87 S.Ct. 788, at page 790, 17 L.Ed.2d 730, rehearing and modification denied, 386 U.S. 988, 87 S.Ct. 1283, 18 L.Ed.2d 243, the court noted: “We made it clear in Preston that whether a search and seizure is unreasonable within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment depends upon the facts and circumstances of each case and pointed out, in par…