METER

v.

NEBRASKA

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Rands et ux., 389 U.S. 121 (U.S. 1967)
  …tly holding that the Government had taken from respondents a compensable right of access to navigable waters and concluding that “port site value should be compen-sable under the Fifth Amendment.” 367 F. 2d, 186, 191 (1966). We granted certiorari, 386 U. S. 989, because of a seeming conflict between the decision below and United States v. Twin City Power Co., 350 U. S. 222 (1956). We reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals because the principles underlying Twin City govern this case and the Court of…
• Smith v. Armontrout, 812 F.2d 1050 (8th Cir. 1987)
  …The Supreme Court retained jurisdiction of Rees while directing the District Court to evaluate Rees’s competence, 384 U.S. at 313-14, 86 S.Ct. at 1506, and later ordered the petition for certiorari held without action until it issued further orders, 386 U.S. 989, 87 S.Ct. 1310, 18 [*1057] L.Ed.2d 333 (1967). No further orders have been reported, and the case is still pending as item S-2 on the Supreme Court’s Special Docket. . Since the District Court found that the State had met this burden, and since we…
• Harvey and Rebecca Rumbaugh v. Procunier, 753 F.2d 395 (5th Cir. 1985)
  …10, 1967 when the Court ordered: "This case is held without action of the petition [the pending application for certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit] until further orders of the Court.” No. 9, Misc. Rees v. Peyton, 386 U.S. 989, 87 S.Ct. 1310, 18 L.Ed.2d 333 (1967). The case continues to date in a pending status before the Court, carried on the Supreme Court’s Special Docket as item S-2. No further action has been reported. . Lenhard v. Wolff, 444 U.S. 1301, 100 S.Ct. 24…

  ← 1 / 2 →