STICKLER

v.

TEHAN, SHERIFF

Citator

Cited By

• Hal Francis Rachal and Edward B. Hunnicutt v. Grover C. Hill, 435 F.2d 59 (5th Cir. 1970)
  …e an order specifying the facts that appear without substantial controversy, with particular regard to the amount of damages and the defense of limitations, before proceeding to trial. Hindes v. United States, 5 Cir., 1963, 326 F. 2d 150, cert. den. 386 U.S. 992, 87 S.Ct. 1307, 18 L.Ed.2d 337; Neff Instrument Corporation v. Cohu Electronics, Inc., 9 Cir., 1959, 269 F. 2d 668. Finally, the appellants contend that the securities involved in this case were exempted from application of the federal security law…
• In re A.H. Robins Co. v. Mabey, 880 F.2d 694 (4th Cir. 1989)
  …s claim. The bankruptcy court has the power to order a creditor who has two funds to satisfy his debt to resort to the fund that will not defeat other creditors. Columbia Bank for Cooperatives v. Lee, 368 F. 2d 934, 939 (4th Cir.1966), cert. denied, 386 U.S. 992, 87 S.Ct. 1308, 18 L.Ed.2d 338 (1967); IV Minor’s Institutes 1248 (1883). Here, the carefully designed reorganization of Robins, in conjunction with the settlement in Breland, provided for satisfaction of the class B claimants. However, some chose t…
• United States v. Vito Giacalone, 588 F.2d 1158 (6th Cir. 1978)
  …reconceptions about the case and try it solely on the evidence presented in court, it is not error to fail to dismiss such a juror for cause. Id. at 432. See also United States ex rel. Stickler v. Tehan, 365 F. 2d 199 (6th Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 386 U.S. 992, 87 S.Ct. 1306, 18 L.Ed.2d 336 (1967), and United States v. Mitchell, 556 F. 2d 371 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 925, 98 S.Ct. 406, 54 L.Ed.2d 284 (1977). There having been no abuse of discretion in failing to strike the jurors for cause and…