ACOSTA

v.

TEXAS

Citator

Cited By (34 total)

• Salas v. State, 246 So. 2d 621 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971)
  …ieve is telling the truth. Daniels v. United States, 129 App.D.C. 250, 393 F. 2d 359, 361 (1968); Williams v. United States, 113 App.D.C. 371, 308 F. 2d 326, 327 (1962); Smith v. United States, 123 App.D.C. 202, 358 F. 2d 833, 835 (1966), cert. den. 386 U.S. 1008, 87 S.Ct. 1350, 18 L.Ed.2d 448; People v. Estrada, 234 Cal.App.2d 136, 44 Cal.Rptr. 165, 175-176, 11 A.L.R.3d 1307 (1965). [*623] Chief Justice Warren in Terry v. Ohio (1968), 392 U.S. 1, 88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889, alluded to the “confrontation…
• State v. Doherty, 240 So. 2d 332 (Fla. 4th DCA 1970)
  …turned on the presence or absence of any one particular fact. Probable cause must be evaluated on the basis of all information available to the police prior to the arrest. Smith v. United States, 1966, 123 U.S.App.D.C. 202, 358 F. 2d 833 (cert. den. 386 U.S. 1008, 87 S.Ct. 1350, 18 L.Ed.2d 448). Secondly, the effect of the Spinelli decision is not as contended by the appellees. Spinelli v. United States dealt with the validity of a search warrant issued by a magistrate on the basis of an affidavit submitted…
• United States v. Edwards, 577 F.2d 883 (5th Cir. 1978)
  …ynthesis of what the police have heard, what they know, and what they observed as trained officers. We weigh not individual layers but the ‘laminated’ total.” Smith v. United States, 123 U.S.App.D.C. 202, 206, 358 F. 2d 833, 837 (1966), cert. denied 386 U.S. 1008, 87 S.Ct. 1350, 18 L.Ed.2d 448 (1967). As we noted in Clark, supra, “Viewing the evidence in this manner (in its totality) it may truly be said that the total may be a sum greater than its parts.” Id. The government concedes that the officer did no…