PARNESS

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Irwin, 612 F.2d 1182 (9th Cir. 1980)
  …in fact, a material issue of fact were raised “which if resolved in accordance with [appellant’s] contentions would entitle him to relief”, an evidentiary hearing would be required. Wright v. Dickson, 336 F. 2d 878, 881 (9 Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 386 U.S. 1012, 87 S.Ct. 1360, 18 L.Ed.2d 444 (1967); see also United States v. Carrion, 463 F. 2d 704, 706 (9 Cir. 1972). On the other hand, if the affidavits show as a matter of law that appellant was or was not entitled to relief, no hearing was required.14 All…
• Parness v. United States, 415 F.2d 346 (3d Cir. 1969)
  …tenee report. That applica [*347] tion was denied by the district judge and that decision was affirmed by this court, October 17, 1968 (Parness v. United States, 368 F. 2d 327). A petition for certiorari to the United States Supreme Court was denied 386 U.S. 1012, 87 S.Ct. 1358, 18 L.Ed.2d 442 (1967). On August 26, 1967 there was another and similar application which was denied. That was affirmed by this court, November 13, 1968, 403 F. 2d 31. An application for certiorari to the Supreme Court was denied Ap…
• Parness v. United States, 403 F.2d 31 (3d Cir. 1968)
  …round that it had been based upon “materially erroneous information with respect to the petitioner’s background” which was “highly prejudicial.” The sentencing judge heard and denied the motion. We affirmed at 368 F. 2d 327 (3 Cir. 1966), cert. den. 386 U.S. 1012, 87 S.Ct. 1358, 18 L.Ed.2d 442 (1967).…