TORRES
v.
NEW YORK
TORRES
NEW YORK
386 U.S. 1014
Supreme Court of the United States (1967)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Theriault v. United States, 401 F.2d 79 (8th Cir. 1968)…f stolen goods and of burglary tools and that they were violating, in the officers’ presence, the Arkansas statutes cited. See United States ex rel. Coffey v. Fay, 242 F.Supp. 382, 385 (S.D.N.Y.1965), aff’d. 356 F. 2d 460 (2 Cir. 1966), cert. denied 386 U.S. 1014, 87 S.Ct. 1350, 18 L.Ed.2d 450. With an offense committed in the presence of the officers, the statute, as the Arkansas court said, “has no application”. These men clearly knew why they were being arrested and Theriault’s protest to the contrary ha…
-
Pruitt v. Campbell, 429 F.2d 642 (4th Cir. 1970)…er whether declaratory relief may be granted. Martin v. Commonwealth of Virginia, 349 F. 2d 781 (4th Cir. 1965). See also, Shannon v. Sequeechi, 365 F. 2d 827 (10th Cir. 1966), cert. denied 386 U.S. 481, 87 S.Ct. 1175, 18 L.Ed.2d 225, reh. denied, 386 U.S. 1014, 87 S.Ct. 1354, 18 L.Ed.2d 452; Forsythe v. Ohio, 333 F. 2d 678 (6th Cir. 1964); Sepulveda v. Colorado, 335 F. 2d 581 (10th Cir. 1964), and Waldon v. Iowa, 323 F. 2d 852 (8th Cir. 1963), to the effect that the Declaratory Judgment Act 28 U.S.C. § 22…