FOSTER, AKA ASHLEY

v.

WASHINGTON

Citator

Cited By (18 total)

• United States v. Franks, 511 F.2d 25 (6th Cir. 1975)
  …4); United States v. Friedman, 445 F. 2d 1076, 1082-1083 (9th [*29] Cir.), cert. denied sub nom., Jacobs v. United States, 404 U.S. 958, 92 S.Ct. 326, 30 L.Ed.2d 275 (1971); Haggard v. United States, 369 F. 2d 968, 973 (8th Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 386 U.S. 1023, 87 S.Ct. 1379, 18 L.Ed.2d 461 (1967). As other courts have recognized, “In determining whether offenses are based on ‘acts or transactions connected together,’ the predominant consideration is whether joinder would serve the goals of trial economy…
• United States v. Bledsoe, 674 F.2d 647 (8th Cir. 1982)
  …Under Fed.R.Crim.P. 8(b), the district court has no discretion to deny severance of misjoined defendants; we have held misjoinder of defendants is inherently prejudicial. Haggard v. United States, 369 F. 2d 968, 972-73 (8th Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 386 U.S. 1023, 87 S.Ct. 1379, 18 L.Ed.2d 461 (1967); United States v. Sanders, 563 F. 2d 379, 382 (8th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1020, 98 S.Ct. 744, 54 L.Ed.2d 767 (1978); see United States v. Marionneaux, 514 F. 2d 1244, 1248 (5th Cir. 1975); 8 Moore’s…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• United States v. O'Connell, 841 F.2d 1408 (8th Cir. 1988)
  …the indictment, also required evidence of income from the sale of illegal drugs. If the indictment invites joint proof, as here, the prima facie validity of joinder is shown. Haggard v. United States, 369 F. 2d 968, 974 (8th Cir.1966), cert. denied, 386 U.S. 1023, 87 S.Ct. 1379, 18 L.Ed.2d 461 (1967). Further, it is clear under our precedents that joinder of the CCE charges in these circumstances was entirely proper. E.g., United States v. Lueth, 807 F. 2d 719, 730 (8th Cir.1986). We believe joinder of t…