BAKER

v.

CALIFORNIA

Citator

Cited By (12 total)

• United States v. Gale Nace and Nathan J. Warren, Sr., 561 F.2d 763 (9th Cir. 1977)
  …d States v. Harris, 534 F. 2d 1371, 1374 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 847, 97 S.Ct. 132, 50 L.Ed.2d 120 (1976); United States v. Colacurcio, 499 F. 2d 1401 (9th Cir. 1974); Lindsey v. United States, 368 F. 2d 633 (9th Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 386 U.S. 1025, 87 S.Ct. 1383, 18 L.Ed.2d 465 (1967). Furthermore, the trial court found that counsel did not exercise due diligence in discovering the so-called new evidence. A showing of due diligence is a condition for the granting of a new trial because of ne…
• United States v. Ramsey, 726 F.2d 601 (10th Cir. 1984)
  …peaching or cumulative. When a witness recants his testimony, presumably he will testify as to the new version at a new trial. Thus, the recantation is substantial evidence. Lindsey v. United States, 368 F. 2d 633, 636 (9th Cir.1966), cert, denied, 386 U.S. 1025, 87 S.Ct. 1383, 18 L.Ed.2d 465 (1967) (dictum); 8A Moore’s Federal Practice § 33.05 (1983). The government does not seriously dispute the materiality of Jackson’s recantation. Although his trial testimony was corroborated in small part by the test…
• Cerda v. United States, 391 F.2d 219 (9th Cir. 1968)
  …s charging “facilitation” of possession or sale of narcotics. Vasquez v. United States, 290 F. 2d 897 (9th Cir. 1961); Bruno v. United States, 259 F. 2d 8 (9th Cir. 1958); accord, United States v. Simons, 374 F. 2d 993 (7th Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 386 U.S. 1025, 87 S.Ct. 1382, 18 L.Ed.2d 464 (1967); Lewis v. United States, 119 U.S.App.D.C. 145, 337 F. 2d 541 (1964), cert. denied, 381 U.S. 920, 85 S.Ct. 1542, 14 L.Ed.2d 440 (1965). Contra, United States v. Prince, 264 F. 2d 850 (3rd Cir. 1959) (as to the ch…