RICH

v.

ATLANTIC COAST LINE RAILROAD CO.

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Papia, 560 F.2d 827 (7th Cir. 1977)
  …the state of the law governing the appropriate timing of instructions limiting the use of extrajudicial statements of a co-conspirator and decided to adhere to our own view in United States v. Halpin, 374 F. 2d 493, 495-96 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 386 U.S. 1032, 87 S.Ct. 1482, 18 L.Ed.2d 594 (1967), that limiting instructions given at the end of trial would be sufficient to protect the defendants from prejudice. Admittedly, we noted in Buschman that “in most cases the trial court would be well advised, pa…
• United States v. Rizzo, 418 F.2d 71 (7th Cir. 1969)
  …v. United States, 344 U.S. 604, 617-619, 73 S.Ct. 481, 97 L.Ed. 593; United States v. Kahn, 7 Cir., 381 F. 2d 824, 838-839, cert. denied, 389 U.S. 1015, 88 S.Ct. 591, 19 L.Ed.2d 661; United States v. Halpin, 7 Cir., 374 F. 2d 493, 495, cert. denied, 386 U.S. 1032, 87 S.Ct. 1482, 18 L.Ed.2d 594. We are not faced with the admission, in a “thin” substantive case, of a statement by a co-defendant, designed only to inculpate the appellant, as in United States v. Guajardo-Melendez, supra, 401 F. 2d at 36-39, or w…
• United States v. Buschman, 527 F.2d 1082 (7th Cir. 1976)
  …1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 948, 95 S.Ct. 1677, 44 L.Ed.2d 101 (1975), as authority for his position. In recognition of the relevance of these cases, the Government asserts that United States v. Halpin, 374 F. 2d 493 (7th Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 386 U.S. 1032, 87 S.Ct. 1482, 18 L.Ed.2d 594, has effectively established the law of this circuit on the narrow issue presented in this appeal. We find persuasive the Government’s analysis of the Halpin decision. In that case, supra at 495, the appellant claimed…

  ← 1 / 2 →