SKOLNICK
v.
KERNER, GOVERNOR OF ILLINOIS, ET AL.

U.S. | 1967-05-15
No. 1401
387 U.S. 91 Supreme Court of the United States (1967) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Johns v. Redeker, 406 F.2d 878 (8th Cir. 1969)
    …me statute involved in Romiti upon the ground that the case before it was controlled by the prior decision in Romiti. The Supreme Court summarily dismissed the appeal from such decision for want of a substantial federal question. Skolnick v. Kerner, 387 U.S. 91, 87 S.Ct. 1506, 18 L.Ed.2d 589. See also Waddell v. Chicago Land Clearance Comm’n, 7 Cir., 206 F. 2d 748. The two judges of the Southern District of Iowa participated and concurred in the opinion in the Clarke case, [*883] written by Judge Stephens…
  • Arland L. Gerberding v. State OF Minn., 426 F.2d 247 (8th Cir. 1970)
    …1774, 12 L.Ed.2d 908 (1964), the Jackson rule was not to be applied retroactively. State ex rel. Gerberding v. Tahash, 275 Minn. 195, 146 N.W. 2d 541 (1966). The United States Supreme Court reversed, in a per curiam decision. Gerberding v. Tahash, 387 U.S. 91, 87 S.Ct. 1506, 18 L.Ed.2d 588 (1967). Thereafter, a state trial judge conducted an evidentiary hearing as to the voluntariness of the confession and concluded that it was voluntary. This was affirmed upon appeal. State v. Gerberding, 282 Minn. 524…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw