WIRTZ, SECRETARY OF LABOR
v.
LOCAL UNIONS NOS. 9, 9-A, & 9-B, INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS
WIRTZ, SECRETARY OF LABOR
LOCAL UNIONS NOS. 9, 9-A, & 9-B, INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS
387 U.S. 96
Supreme Court of the United States (1967)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
Upon the joint suggestion of the parties and an independent examination of the case, the petition for a writ of certiorari is granted, the judgments are vacated and the case is remanded with directions to dismiss the complaint as moot.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Wirtz v. Hotel, 381 F.2d 500 (2d Cir. 1967)…int to the Secretary,” Wirtz v. Local [*507] Unions 410, etc., supra, 366 F. 2d at 442; accord, Wirtz v. Locals 9, 9-A & 9-B, Int’l Union of Operating Engineers, 366 F. 2d 911 (10th Cir. 1966), vacated as moot, 35 U.S.L.Week 3403 (U.S. May 15,1967), 387 U.S. 96, 87 S.Ct. 1505, 18 L.Ed.2d 586 (1967); see Wirtz v. Local 191, Int’l Bhd. of Teamsters 321 F. 2d 445, 448 (2d Cir. 1963). III. The trial judge, though he refused to void the election, enjoined the union from applying its restrictive by-law in futu…
-
Wirtz v. Local Union NO. 705, Hotel & Rest. Emps. & Bartenders Union, AFL-CIO, 389 F.2d 717 (6th Cir. 1968)…ction 401(a) of the Act (29 U.S.C. 481(c). “The. violations of Section 401 of the Act (29 U.S.C. 481), found and alleged as above, may have affected the outcome of the election.” . Certiorari was granted and this decision was vacated for mootness. 387 U.S. 96. The Secretary’s brief states that after the Solicitor General filed a petition for cer-tiorari, the parties filed a joint suggestion of mootness, on the ground that the case had been settled in an agreement calling for a supervised election of all…
-
Brock v. Int'l Org. OF Masters, 842 F.2d 70 (4th Cir. 1988)…regulation, 29 C.F.R. § 452.37(b), the Secretary referred to two cases, Wirtz v. Local Unions No. 9, 9-A [*72] and 9-B, International Union of Operating Engineers, 254 F.Supp. 980 (D.Colo. 1965), aff'd, 366 F. 2d 911 (10 Cir.1966), vacated as moot, 387 U.S. 96, 87 S.Ct. 1505, 18 L.Ed.2d 586 (1967), and Goldberg v. Amarillo General Drivers, Teamsters Local 577, 214 F.Supp. 74 (N.D.Tex.1963), apparently to justify the language he promulgated. In Local Unions No. 9, the court invalidated a provision of the…