MASCUILLI, ADMINISTRATRIX

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (20 total)

• Usner v. Luckenbach Overseas Corp., 400 U.S. 494 (U.S. 1971)
  …; Gutierrez v. Waterman S. S. Corp., 373 U. S. 206. 'No member of the ship’s crew was' in any way involved in this case. The petitioner’s reliance upon our summary per curiam, reversal of a judgment for the shipowner in Mascuilli v. United States, 387 U. S. 237, is misplaced. There a longshoreman had been killed during a loading operation aboard a Government vessel when, under the strain of the opposing pull of two winches, a.heavy shackle parted, recoiled, and struck him. The petition for certiorari posed…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Grigsby v. Coastal Marine Serv. OF Tex., Inc., 412 F.2d 1011 (5th Cir. 1969)
  …man Occurring at Moment of Injury to Co-Worker Does Not Render Vessel Unseaworthy, 5 Hous.L.Rev. 371 (1967). Cf. Mitchell v. Trawler Racer, Inc., 1960, 362 U.S. 539, 80 S.Ct. 926, 4 L.Ed.2d 941, 1960 A.M.C. 1503. . Mascuilli v. United States, 1967, 387 U.S. 237, 87 S.Ct. 1705, 18 L.Ed.2d 743, 1967 A.M.C. 1702. . This question is presented directly in several cases, perhaps obliquely in some, now pending before other panels of this Court. See Luckenbach Overseas Corp. v. Usner, No. 25344; Wilson v. Societa…
• Venable v. A/S DET Forenede Dampskibsselskab, 399 F.2d 347 (4th Cir. 1968)
  …2d 113, 124 (1964), that “[t]he obvious trend of the Supreme Court decisions is toward providing ever increasing protection for crewmen [or] longshoremen * * * who may be called upon to work aboard vessels.” Recently in Mascuilli v. United States, 387 U.S. 237, 87 S.Ct. 1705, 18 L.Ed.2d 743 (1967), the Court was squarely confronted with the necessity of deciding whether a vessel could be rendered un-seaworthy solely by the longshoremen’s negligent handling of otherwise proper equipment. [*351] Maseuilli,…

  ← 1 / 2 →

Authorities Cited

• Mahnich v. S. S.S. Co., 321 U.S. 96 (U.S. 1944)
• Crumady v. The Joachim Hendrik Fisser, 358 U.S. 423 (U.S. 1959)