CAMODEO
v.
UNITED STATES

U.S. | 1967-06-05
No. 1073
Mr. Justice Harlan, Mr. Justice Stewart, and Mr. Justice White are of the opinion that certiorari should be denied.
387 U.S. 575 Supreme Court of the United States (1967) Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit for further consideration in light of Anders v. California, 386 U. S. 738.

Mr. Justice Harlan, Mr. Justice Stewart, and Mr. Justice White are of the opinion that certiorari should be denied.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Smith v. United States, 384 F.2d 649 (8th Cir. 1967)
    …the court or the client. The cause of advocacy is not served to read a brief filed by appellant’s own counsel asserting the government’s position in the case. See Harders v. State of California, 373 F. 2d 839 (9 Cir. 1967); Camodeo v. United States, 387 U.S. 575, 87 S.Ct. 2070, 18 L.Ed.2d 966. We are of the opinion that under the present status of the record appellant is entitled to counsel upon appeal and it would be of lesser value to appoint other counsel. Application for leave to withdraw is denied.…
  • United States v. Williams, 379 F.2d 319 (2d Cir. 1967)
    …hat counsel should be relieved. Appellant’s appointed counsel represented him as an advocate upon appeal, and we have been fully advised of the facts of record and the legal contentions which can be based upon them. Compare Camodeo v. United States, 387 U.S. 575, 87 S.Ct. 2070, 18 L.Ed.2d 966 (1967); Anders v. State of California, 386 U.S. 264, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Accordingly, we grant the motion and relieve Anthony F. Marra, Esq., Joshua N. Koplovitz, Esq., and the Legal Aid Society from…
  • United States v. Camodeo, 383 F.2d 770 (2d Cir. 1967)
    …appeal was frivolous, and we dismissed the appeal. 367 F. 2d 146. The Supreme Court vacated our judgment on June 5, 1967 and remanded the case “for further consideration in light of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493.” 387 U.S. 575, 87 S.Ct. 2070. We conclude that the affidavit accompanying counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw substantially complied with the requirements which the Court announced in Anders v. California, and that counsel, having sufficiently presented to thi…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw