BRYANS

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Case-Swayne Co., Inc. v. Sunkist Growers, Inc., 389 U.S. 384 (U.S. 1967)
  …Capper-Volstead Act, 42 Stat. 388, 7 U. S. C. § 291,2 and therefore could [*386] not be held for any intraorganizational conspiracy to restrain trade. In order to determine the scope of that exemption from the antitrust laws, we granted certiorari. 387 U. S. 903 (1967). The issue is whether Sunkist is an association of “[p]er-sons engaged in the production of agricultural products as . . . fruit growers” within the meaning of the Capper-Volstead Act, notwithstanding that certain of its members are not actu…
• Sperling v. United States, 692 F.2d 223 (2d Cir. 1982)
  …34 L.Ed.2d 672 (1972), and Salta v. United States, 44 F. 2d 752, 753 (1st Cir. 1930). For habeas corpus cases, see Johnson v. Massey, 516 F. 2d 1001, 1002 (5th Cir. 1975), Bryans v. United States, 374 F. 2d 505, 506 (5th Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 387 U.S. 903, 87 S.Ct. 1705, 18 L.Ed.2d 639 (1967), and Crawford v. Cox, 307 F.Supp. 732, 736 (W.D.Va.1969). . On June 3, 1977, I sent a memo to Judges Waterman and Motley, the panel majority in United States v. Sperling, 560 F. 2d 1050, in which I said: If my…