BRYANT-BUCKNER ASSOCIATES, INC.

v.

DANVILLE TOBACCO ASSOCIATION ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (41 total)

• United States v. Martino, 648 F.2d 367 (5th Cir. 1981)
  …re obviously is a conflict in the evidence as to exactly when Noriega became a government informant, the answer to that question is not as significant as Young suggests. His reliance on United States v. Chase, 372 F. 2d 453 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 387 U.S. 907, 87 S.Ct. 1688, 18 L.Ed.2d 626; 387 U.S. 913, 87 S.Ct. 1701, 18 L.Ed.2d 635 (1967), is misplaced. That case stands for the proposition that “one who acts as a government agent and enters into a purported conspiracy in the secret role of an informer…
• Erlenbaugh v. United States, 409 U.S. 239 (U.S. 1972)
  …we do note that the reach of the statute clearly was not limited to instances in which organized criminal activity in one State is managed from another State, see n. 15, supra. But cf. United States v. Chase, 372 F. 2d 453, 460 (CA4), cert. denied, 387 U. S. 907 (1967) (“[KJnowledge and intent to transmit gambling paraphernalia in interstate commerce are elements of the crime created by” § 1953). “The committee . . . felt that the bill, as introduced, might be so interpreted as to bring within its criminal…
• United States v. Porth, 426 F.2d 519 (10th Cir. 1970)
  …be barred by any statute of limitations.” . The ex parte dismissal before trial was authorized by Rule 48(a), Fed.R.Crim.P. United States v. Boiardo, 408 F. 2d 112 (3d Cir. 1969) ; United States v. Chase, 372 F. 2d 453 (3d Cir. 1967), cert, denied, 387 U.S. 907, 87 S.Ct. 1688, 18 L.Ed.2d 626.…