CREDITORS' COMMITTEE OF DRIVE-IN DEVELOPMENT CORP. ET AL.

v.

NATIONAL BOULEVARD BANK OF CHICAGO

Citator

Cited By (16 total)

• MCI Commc'ns Corp. & MCI Telecomms. Corp. v. Am. Tel. & Tel. Co., 708 F.2d 1081 (7th Cir. 1983)
  …udicial because it, in effect, deprived AT & T of an opportunity to present its defense theories to the jury. Citing Florists’ Nationwide Telephone Delivery Network v. Florists’ Telegraph Delivery Association, 371 F. 2d 263 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 387 U.S. 909, 87 S.Ct. 1691, 18 L.Ed.2d 627 (1967) (“FTD ”), AT&T argues that it was entitled to a specific instruction on each theory for which there was record evidence. The court in FTD found error in the trial court’s refusal to instruct on each defense theo…
• Ohio-Sealy Mattress Mfg. Co. v. Sealy, 585 F.2d 821 (7th Cir. 1978)
  …con Theatres, Inc. v. Westover, 359 U.S. 500, 79 S.Ct. 948, 3 L.Ed.2d 988 (1959). This court’s decision in Florists’ Nationwide Telephone Delivery Network v. Florists’ Telegraph Delivery Association, 371 F. 2d 263, 270-71 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 387 U.S. 909, 87 S.Ct. 1686, 18 L.Ed.2d 627 (1967), provides a useful summary of the implications of a jury’s antitrust verdict for a district court’s subsequent ruling on equitable relief. Any actual issues necessarily and actually decided by the jury are forec…
• Hetty FEY v. Walston & Co., Inc., 493 F.2d 1036 (7th Cir. 1974)
  …ves and prior experience, and the rule that both parties are entitled to have their respective theories of a case fairly presented to the jury. Florists' Nationwide Tel. Del. Net. v. Florists’ Tel. Del. Ass’n, 371 F. 2d 263 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 387 U.S. 909, 87 S.Ct. 1686, 1691, 18 L.Ed.2d 627 (1967); Wetherbee v. Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Ry. Co., 191 F. 2d 302, 311-312 (7th Cir. 1951); Halladay v. Verschoor, 381 F. 2d 100, 113 (8th Cir. 1967). Defendants contend that the court erred in telling the jur…