BROWN ET AL., DBA GEM DAIRY

v.

UNITED STATES ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (23 total)

• Polcover v. Secretary OF the Treasury, 477 F.2d 1223 (D.C. Cir. 1973)
  …tted.) See also Finfer v. Caplin, supra, 344 F. 2d at 40, and Grossner v. Trustees of Columbia University in City of New York, 287 F.Supp. 535, 551 (S.D.N.Y. 1968). In Cohen v. United States, 369 F. 2d 976, 988, 177 Ct.Cl. 599 (1966), cert. denied, 387 U.S. 917, 87 S.Ct. 2029, 18 L.Ed.2d 969 (1967), the Court of Clayns was confronted with the identical problem. The test utilized in Cohen, and the one we feel should control, was whether any “demonstrable prejudice” could be shown to have been caused by the…
• Haynes v. The United States, 418 F.2d 1380 (Ct. Cl. 1969)
  …gh there was error in the submission of this letter, it must be regarded as harmless error since there is no indication whatsoever that the letter was relied upon. Cohen v. United States, 369 F. 2d 976, 988, 177 Ct.Cl. 599, 618 (1966), cert. denied, 387 U.S. 917, 87 S.Ct. 2029, 18 L.Ed.2d 969 (1967); see Putschoegl v. United States, 165 Ct.Cl. 65, 77 (1964). The same conclusion can be reached in regard to the issue involving the submission of the diagrams and charts which were not agreed to by plaintiff. P…
• Gratehouse v. The United States, 512 F.2d 1104 (Ct. Cl. 1975)
  …the rule reiterated most recently in Hart v. United States, 204 Ct.Cl. 925 (1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1049, 95 S.Ct. 624, 42 L.Ed.2d 643 (1974), should apply: * * * In Cohen v. United States, 369 F. 2d 976, 177 Ct.Cl. 599 (1966), cert. denied, 387 U.S. 917, 87 S.Ct. 2029, 18 L.Ed.2d 969 (1967), this court held that a plaintiff is required to show “demonstrable prejudice” to support a charge of procedural error. We see no such prejudice in this case. * * * . In fact, any financial prejudice involved co…