TIVEY

v.

RHAY, PENITENTIARY SUPERINTENDENT

Citator

Cited By

• IIT v. Cornfeld, 619 F.2d 909 (2d Cir. 1980)
  …pra, 288 F. 2d at 88, 90; and Developments — Statutes of Limitations, supra, 63 Harv.L.Rev. at 1215. These and other cases were reviewed in International Railways of Central America v. United Fruit Co., 373 F. 2d 408, 412-17 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 387 U.S. 921, 87 S.Ct. 2031, 2035, 18 L.Ed.2d 975 (1967), a suit by minority stockholders against a third party which allegedly controlled the corporation. The principle we announced there was that to toll the statute on the ground of adverse domination “at leas…
• Hayes v. Solomon, 597 F.2d 958 (5th Cir. 1979)
  …ar a subsequent federal antitrust suit. The Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit suggested this rationale in obiter dictum contained in International Railways of Central America v. United Fruit Company, 373 F. 2d 408, 418 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 387 U.S. 921, 87 S.Ct. 2031, 18 L.Ed.2d 975 (1967), citing the Restatement of Judgments § 62: Section 62k of the Restatement suggests that where the plaintiff sues in a court whose sovereign cannot or has not made available a court which can afford the plaintif…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Armstrong v. Clovis McALPIN, 699 F.2d 79 (2d Cir. 1983)
  …(2d Cir.1943); Moviecolor Ltd. v. Eastman Kodak Co., 288 F. 2d 80, 88 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 821, 82 S.Ct. 39, 7 L.Ed.2d 26 (1961); International Railways of Central America v. United Fruit Co., 373 F. 2d 408, 414 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 387 U.S. 921, 87 S.Ct. 2031, 18 L.Ed.2d 975 (1967); IIT, An International Investment Trust v. Cornfeld, 619 F. 2d 909, 930 (2d Cir.1980). Before this doctrine can be applied, however, the plaintiff “has the burden of showing ‘a full, complete and exclusive con…