LANDAU
v.
FORDING, CHIEF OF POLICE, ET AL.
LANDAU
FORDING, CHIEF OF POLICE, ET AL.
388 U.S. 456
Supreme Court of the United States (1967)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 12 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment of the Court of Appeal of California, First Appellate District, is affirmed.
Mr. Justice Black, Mr. Justice Douglas, Mr. Justice Stewart, and Mr. Justice Fortas would grant the petition and reverse.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Mitchum v. State, 251 So. 2d 298 (Fla. 1st DCA 1971)…ations are obscene as a matter of law, we heartily agree with the Attorney General’s argument that many of the magazines involved here come within the proscriptive influence of Landau v. Fording, 245 Cal.App.2d 820, 54 Cal.Rptr. 177 (1966), affirmed 388 U.S. 456, 87 S.Ct. 2109, 18 L.Ed.2d 1317 (1967), and like cases. The State’s argument that the evolution of the law of obscenity during the early part of the last decade reflected a phenomena appropriately termed as “creeping eroticism” was sagaciously predi…
-
Interstate Cir., Inc. v. City of Dallas, 390 U.S. 676 (U.S. 1968)…erry, 388 U. S. 448; Books, Inc. v. United States, 388 U. S. 449; Rosenbloom v. Virginia, 388 U. S. 450; A Quantity of Copies of Books v. Kansas, 388 U. S. 452; Mazes v. Ohio, 388 U. S. 453; Schackman v. California, 388 U. S. 454; Landau v. Fording, 388 U. S. 456; Potomac News Co. v. United States, 389 U. S. 47; Conner v. City of Hammond, 389 U. S. 48; Central Magazine Sales, Ltd. v. United States, 389 U. S. 50; Chance v. California, 389 U. S. 89. The Court emphasizes at greater length the failure of the Bo…
-
Huffman v. United States, 470 F.2d 386 (D.C. Cir. 1971)…r until it has been accomplished some five times, all with different partners. Each time the act is as vividly portrayed upon the screen as was the scene in the hospital room. In one instance the sex act is in the form of rape. . Landau v. Fording, 388 U.S. 456, 87 S.Ct. 2109, 18 L.Ed.2d 1317 (1967), affirming, 245 Cal.App.2d 820, 54 Cal.Rptr. 177 (Dist.Ct.App.Calif.1966). . 54 Cal.Rptr. at 178, 245 Cal.App.2d at 822. We attack no precedential weight to tke 4 — 4 vote in Grove Press v. Maryland State Boa…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence