PARKS
v.
SIMPSON TIMBER CO. ET AL.

U.S. | 1967-06-12
No. 1335
Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice- Stewart are of the opinion that certiorari should be denied.
388 U.S. 459 Supreme Court of the United States (1967) Negative Treatment
Cited by 18 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is vacated. Albanese v. N. V. Nederl. Amerik Stoomv. Moats., 382 U. S. 283. The case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in order that that court may pass upon the issues in this case not covered by its prior opinion.

Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice-Stewart are of the opinion that certiorari should be denied.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Erling David Larsen v. Gen. Motors Corp., 391 F.2d 495 (8th Cir. 1968)
    …original division’s opinion, reported in CCH Prod. Liab.Rptr. ¶ 5498 (1965), was reversed by the Court en Banc at 369 F. 2d 324 (1966), which in turn was vacated by the Supreme Court and remanded to pass upon issues not covered in its prior opinion, 388 U.S. 459, 87 S.Ct. 2115, 18 L.Ed.2d 1319 (1966)). Accepting, therefore, the principle that a manufacturer’s duty of design and construction extends to producing a product that is reasonably fit for its intended use and free of hidden defects that could rend…
  • Watz v. Zapata Off-Shore Co., 431 F.2d 100 (5th Cir. 1970)
    …acturer of the doors. In that case’s long journey through a Ninth Circuit three-judge panel (opinion and dissent), 9 Cir. 1966, A.M.C. 1081, en banc (opinion and dissent), 369 F. 2d 324, the Supreme Court (per curiam vacating of the judgment), 1967, 388 U.S. 459, 87 S.Ct. 2115, 18 L.Ed.2d 1319, two law review comments, 66 Colum.L.Rev. 1190 (1961); 54 Geo.L.J. 1439 (1960) and remand 390 F. 2d 353, cert. denied, 393 U.S. 858, 89 S.Ct. 126, 21 L.Ed.2d 127, the issue was not mentioned. Nor was the issue framed…
  • Austin v. Unarco Indus., Inc., 705 F.2d 1 (1st Cir. 1983)
    …lity claims are to be heard in admiralty, and it seems clear that they are, see Smith v. Pan Air Corp., supra, 684 F. 2d at 1111 n. 33 and cases cited therein; see also Simpson Timber Co. v. Parks, 369 F. 2d 324 (9th Cir.1966), vacated and remanded, 388 U.S. 459, 87 S.Ct. 2115, 18 L.Ed.2d 1319 (1967), on remand, 390 F. 2d 353 (9th Cir.1968) (implicit Supreme Court approval of admiralty’s acceptance of land based products liability law), then whatever advantage accrues from a uniform national law governing t…

Previewing 3 of 9 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw