STELLAS

v.

ESPERDY, DISTRICT DIRECTOR, IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE

Citator

Cited By

• United States ex rel. Tomislav Kordic and Venka Kordic v. Esperdy, 386 F.2d 232 (2d Cir. 1967)
  …is title [8 U.S.C. § 1252] to cases falling within the provisions of this subsection.” . vulnote 2 supra. . The anxiin Stellas was vacated by the Supreme Court and remanded with instructions that it be returned to the Service for further hearings. 388 U.S. 462, 87 S.Ct. 2121, 18 L.Ed.2d 1322 (1967). This was done at the suggestion of the Service itself to allow the relator to take advantage of an informal hearing non-(instituted while the cause was sub judice) by which an alien crewman paroled into the co…
• SIU Fung LUK v. Rosenberg, 409 F.2d 555 (9th Cir. 1969)
  …” For the reasons herein stated, the decision of the district court is affirmed. . The judgment in Stellas was vacated by the Supreme Court and remanded with instructions that it be returned to the Service, at the suggestion of the Service itself. 388 U.S. 462, 87 S.Ct. 2121, 18 L.Ed.2d 1322 (1967). We agree with the second circuit, see United States ex rel. Kordic v. Esperdy, supra, 386 F. 2d at 236, a. 4, that the language in Stellas has continuing validity.…
• Fook Hong MAK v. Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., 435 F.2d 728 (2d Cir. 1970)
  …ty held, or ration [*731] al, as the dissenting judge thought. We have stated more recently, in United States ex rel. Stellas v. Esperdy, 366 F. 2d 266, 269-270 (2 Cir.1966), vacated and remanded at the INS’ suggestion, on a point not here material, 388 U.S. 462, 87 S.Ct. 2121, 18 L.Ed.2d 1322 (1967): * * * the Attorney General may govern the exercise of his discretion by written or unwritten rules; indeed it would be remarkable if he did not. Any such decision is an application of facts to principles. All…