FOX
v.
OREGON

U.S. | 1967-06-12
No. 1421
Mr. Justice Black, Mr. Justice Harlan, and Mr. Justice Stewart are of the opinion that certiorari should be denied.
388 U.S. 466 Supreme Court of the United States (1967) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are-granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Oregon for further consideration in light of Anders v. California, 386 U. S. 738.

Mr. Justice Black, Mr. Justice Harlan, and Mr. Justice Stewart are of the opinion that certiorari should be denied.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Zedekiah Suggs v. United States, 391 F.2d 971 (D.C. Cir. 1968)
    …forbids us to affirm the judgment in the present posture of the case. Our doubts as to the permissibility of our entering an order at this time dismissing the appeal for lack of a non-frivolous question are underscored by the order in Fox v. Oregon, 388 U.S. 466, 87 S.Ct. 2129, 18 L.Ed. 1324 (1967), whereby the judgment in Oregon v. Fox, 421 P. 2d 977 (Ore.Sup.Ct.1966)7 was vacated and remanded for further consideration in the light of Anders. It is said, why should not the Government “adopt” the “brief” f…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw