FERGUSON ET AL.
v.
UNITED STATES
FERGUSON ET AL.
UNITED STATES
388 U.S. 922
Supreme Court of the United States (1967)
Caution
Cited by 26 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (26 total)
-
United States v. McCONNEY, 728 F.2d 1195 (9th Cir. 1984)…hat suspects possessed a shotgun and had been previously convicted of armed assault against police officers); Gilbert v. United States, 366 F. 2d 923 (9th Cir.) (officers knew suspect was charged with killing policeman with a firearm), cert. denied, 388 U.S. 922, 87 S.Ct. 2123, 18 L.Ed.2d 1370 (1966). Indeed, as stated in United States v. Kane, 637 F. 2d 974 (3d Cir.1981), “courts have generally found reasonable ground for an exception [to the knock-notice requirement only] when the inhabitants ... posses…
-
Sabbath v. United States, 391 U.S. 585 (U.S. 1968)…at the agents’ lack of compliance with the statute is excused because an announcement might have endangered the informant Jones or the officers themselves. See, e. g., Gilbert v. United States, 366 F. 2d 923, 931 (C. A. 9th Cir. 1966), cert, denied, 388 U. S. 922 (1967); cf. Ker v. California, 374 U. S. 23, 39-40 (1963) (opinion of Clark, J.); id., at 47 (opinion of Brennan, J.). However, whether or not “exigent circumstances,” Miller v. United States, supra, at 309, would excuse compliance with § 3109,8 thi…
-
United States v. Fortes, 619 F.2d 108 (1st Cir. 1980)…ct of [that] original testimony . . . .” United States v. Novick, 124 F. 2d 107, 109 (2d Cir. 1941), cert. denied, 315 U.S. 813, 62 S.Ct. 795, 86 L.Ed. 1212 (1942). See also Gilbert v. United States, 366 F. 2d 923, 950 (9th Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 388 U.S. 922, 87 S.Ct. 2123, 18 L.Ed.2d 1370 (1967). The government was entitled to have Jemison complete the picture she had begun on direct. We find no error in the admission of this evidence against her.5 As to Fortes, the introduction of the evidence of his…
Previewing 3 of 26 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence