LORDI, DIRECTOR OF DIVISION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL, DEPARTMENT OF LAW AND PUBLIC SAFETY OF NEW JERSEY

v.

EPSTEIN ET AL., TRADING AS STRATFORD INTERNATIONAL TOBACCO CO.

U.S. | 1967-10-16

No. 322

389 U.S. 29 Supreme Court of the United States (1967) Positive Treatment

Cited by 4 cases

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam. Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Harlan

Per Curiam.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. Cf. Hostetter v. Idlewild Bon Voyage Liquor Corp., 377 U. S. 324.

Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Harlan would note probable jurisdiction and set the case for oral argument.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

The Div. OF Bev. v. Bonanni Ship Supply, Inc., 356 So. 2d 308 (Fla. 1978)

…to in-state commerce. Bonanni contends that Duckworth and Carter are not relevant in this case because both involved state regulation in areas devoid of any federal regulatory activity, and that Epstein v. Lordi, 261 F.Supp. 921 (D.N.J.1966), aff’d, 389 U.S. 29, 88 S.Ct. 106, 19 L.Ed.2d 29 (1967), is more to the point. Epstein was a Commerce Clause case involving competing state and federal regulations. Epstein is persuasive here, and we hold that the state’s regulatory activity is not reasonably necessar…
David Reid & the Dep't of Revenue v. Exports, Inc., 388 So. 2d 1332 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980)

…valorem taxation. On the authority of the following cases we believe the trial court’s ruling was correct: McGoldrick v. Gulf Oil Corporation, 309 U.S. 414, 60 S.Ct. 664, 84 L.Ed. 840 (1940); Epstein v. Lordi, 261 F.Supp. 921 (D.N.J.1966), affirmed 389 U.S. 29, 88 S.Ct. 106, 19 L.Ed.2d 29 (1967); District of Columbia v. International Distributing Corporation, 118 U.S.App.D.C. 71, 331 F. 2d 817 (1964); District of Columbia v. Samuel Meisel & Co., Inc., 316 A. 2d 546 (D.C.App.1974); Ammex Warehouse Company…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw