HERBERT THURMAN SMITH, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
HERBERT THURMAN SMITH, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
191 So. 2d 605
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1966)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 8 cases
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed on the authority of Murray v. State, Fla.App.1965, 175 So.2d 236; Lee v. State, Fla.App.1965, 172 So.2d 621.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Gidwani v. Roberts, 248 So. 3d 203 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018)
-
Sheridan v. Woody Kaiser, 364 So. 2d 839 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978)…of the plaintiff’s dealings with the two brokers and their responsibilities to the plaintiff under their referral arrangement. Accordingly, the summary final judgment is reversed upon authority of the rule stated in Deehl v. Sparks Construction Co., 191 So. 2d 605, 607 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966). Reversed.…
-
Miss Dorissa, Inc. v. Crompton-Richmond, Inc., 201 So. 2d 84 (Fla. 3d DCA 1967)…fact under the issues as made by the original complaint and general denial answer thereto. See: Harvey Building, Inc. v. Haley, Fla.1965, 175 So. 2d 780; Holl v. Talcott, Fla.1966, 191 So. 2d 40; Deehl v. Sparks Construction Co., Inc., Fla.App.1966, 191 So. 2d 605; Visingardi v. Tirone, Fla.1966, 193 So. 2d 601. This cause is remanded to the trial court for the purpose of receiving evidence on the issues as made by the pleadings and rendition of a final judgment thereon. Reversed and remanded with direction…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- LEE v. State, 172 So. 2d 621 (Fla. 1st DCA 1965)
- Murray v. State, 175 So. 2d 236 (Fla. 3d DCA 1965)