CHANCE
v.
CALIFORNIA
CHANCE
CALIFORNIA
389 U.S. 89
Supreme Court of the United States (1967)
Caution
Also reported at: 19 L. Ed. 2d 256 · 88 S. Ct. 253 · 1967 U.S. LEXIS 347 · SCDB 1967-019
Cited by 14 cases
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.
The motion to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is reversed. Redrup v. New York, 386 U. S. 767.
Mr. Justice Harlan would affirm for the reasons set forth in his separate opinion in Roth v. United States, 354 U. S. 476, 496, 500-503, and in his dissenting opinion in Memoirs v. Massachusetts, 383 U. S. 413, 455.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton, 413 U.S. 49 (U.S. 1973)…); Schackman v. California, 388 U. S. 454 (1967); Potomac News Co. v. United States, 389 U. S. 47 (1967); Conner v. City of Hammond, 389 U. S. 48 (1967); Central Magazine Sales, Ltd. v. United States, [*83] 389 U. S. 50 (1967); Chance v. California, 389 U. S. 89 (1967); 1. M. Amusement Corp. v. Ohio, 389 U. S. 573 (1968); Robert-Arthur Management Corp. v. Tennessee, 389 U. S. 578 (1968); Felton v. City of Pensacola, 390 U. S. 340 (1968); Henry v. Louisiana, 392 U. S. 655 (1968); Cain v. Kentucky, supra; Bl…
-
Interstate Cir., Inc. v. City of Dallas, 390 U.S. 676 (U.S. 1968)…3; Schackman v. California, 388 U. S. 454; Landau v. Fording, 388 U. S. 456; Potomac News Co. v. United States, 389 U. S. 47; Conner v. City of Hammond, 389 U. S. 48; Central Magazine Sales, Ltd. v. United States, 389 U. S. 50; Chance v. California, 389 U. S. 89. The Court emphasizes at greater length the failure of the Board and the Texas courts to proffer any clarification of the ordinance. This compels examination of the ordinance’s terms, but it does [*709] not, of course, offer any independent basis f…
-
United States v. Cyril J. Niederberger, 580 F.2d 63 (3d Cir. 1978)…is not among them. See, e. g., United States v. Alessio, 528 F. 2d 1079, 1082 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 948, 96 S.Ct. 3167, 49 L.Ed.2d 1184 (1976); United States v. Umans, 368 F. 2d 725, 729-30 (2d Cir. 1966), cert. dismissed, 389 U.S. 80, 88 S.Ct. 253, 19 L.Ed.2d 255 (1967); United States v. Irwin, 354 F. 2d 192, 197 (2d Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 383 U.S. 967, 86 S.Ct. 1272, 16 L.Ed.2d 308 (1966). It follows that if proof of a quid pro quo is not required under § 201(f), it need not be establishe…
Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476 (U.S. 1957)
- A Book Named "john Cleland's Memoirs of a Woman of Pleasure" v. Attorney General of Massachusetts, 383 U.S. 413 (U.S. 1966)
- Redrup v. New York, 386 U.S. 767 (U.S. 1967)