GERMANN
v.
UNITED STATES
GERMANN
UNITED STATES
389 U.S. 329
Supreme Court of the United States (1967)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 19 L. Ed. 2d 559 · 88 S. Ct. 503 · 1967 U.S. LEXIS 69 · SCDB 1967-040
Cited by 15 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
The petition for certiorari is granted.
The judgment of the United States Court, of Appeals for the Second Circuit is vacated, and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in order to give that court an opportunity to consider the motion to substitute the Konkursamt Basel-Stadt (the Bankruptcy Office of Basel, Switzerland) as party petitioner, and to reconsider that court’s former adjudication of contempt and the accompanying fine in light of the original petitioner’s death.
It is so ordered.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
In re a Grand Jury Subpoena Directed to Marc Rich & Co. v. United States, 707 F.2d 663 (2d Cir. 1983)…ground that he is a non-resident alien. United States v. Field, 532 F. 2d 404, 407-10 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 940, 97 S.Ct. 354, 50 L.Ed.2d 309 (1976); United States v. Germana, 370 F. 2d 1019, 1022-23 (2d Cir.), vacated on other grounds, 389 U.S. 329, 88 S.Ct. 503, 19 L.Ed.2d 559 (1967). Neither may the witness resist the production of documents on the ground that the documents are located abroad. United States v. First National City Bank, 396 F. 2d 897, 900-01 (2d Cir.1968); Federal Maritime…
-
United States v. Johnpoll, 739 F.2d 702 (2d Cir. 1984)…ng of Rule 15. In the first place, being Swiss nationals in Switzerland, they were not amenable to service of United States process, either by statute or treaty.9 United States v. Germann, 370 F. 2d 1019, 1022-23 (2d Cir.), vacated on other grounds, 389 U.S. 329, 88 S.Ct. 503, 19 L.Ed.2d 559 (1967). The government asked the witnesses to appear voluntarily and toward that end offered to pay their travel expenses, $30 per day witness fee and $75 per day subsistence fee as authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 1821. -Ho…
-
In re Grand Jury Impaneled January 21, 529 F.2d 543 (3d Cir. 1976)…6 (1974). In at least one case prior to the enactment of § 1826 a federal court imposed a coercive fine on a witness who failed to appear before a grand jury. United States v. Germann, 370 F. 2d 1019 (2d Cir.), vacated per curiam on other grounds, 389 U.S. 329, 88 S.Ct. 503, 19 L.Ed.2d 559 (1967). We do not detect in the enactment of § 1826 an intention on the part of Congress to remove from the arsenal of the federal courts an enforcement weapon they were long thought to possess. This conclusion is re…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence