SEASIDE PROPERTIES, INC.

v.

STATE ROAD DEPARTMENT OF FLORIDA

Citator

Cited By

• Suburban Realty Co. v. United States, 615 F.2d 171 (5th Cir. 1980)
  …T.C. 1278, 1286 (1970). [*183] However, neither party has cited any Supreme Court or Fifth Circuit precedent which states the proposition that the relevant holding purpose is that existing at the moment of sale. Suburban relies on Malat v. Riddell, 389 U.S. 569, 86 S.Ct. 1030, 16 L.Ed.2d 102 (1966) and Fahs v. Crawford, 161 F. 2d 315 (5th Cir. 1947). Malat does not address this issue at all, but concerns the meaning of the word “primarily” in 26 U.S.C. § 1221(1). See 389 U.S. at 571-572, 86 S.Ct. at 1032.…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Hudson River Fishermen's Ass'n v. Fed. Power Comm'n, 498 F.2d 827 (2d Cir. 1974)
  …hat of a reviewing body.” Interstate Commerce Commission v. City of Jersey City, 322 U.S. 503, 514-515, 64 S.Ct. 1129, 1134, 88 L.Ed. 1420 (1944). Braswell Motor Freight Lines, Inc. v. United States, 275 F.Supp. 98 (W.D.Tenn.1967), aff’d per curiam, 389 U.S. 569, 88 S.Ct. 692, 19 L.Ed.2d 779 (1968). The petition to review the Commission’s order denying Scenic Hudson’s petition to reopen for further study of alternative means of generating electricity is, therefore, dismissed, without prejudice, however, to…
• Appalachian Power Co. v. Train, 620 F.2d 1040 (4th Cir. 1980)
  …Alcoa Steamship Co. v. Federal Maritime Commission, 321 F. 2d 756 (D.C.Cir. 1963) (Maritime Commission rejected recommendation of examiner and approved pooling agreement); Bras-well Motor Freight Lines v. USA, 275 F.Supp. 98 (W.D.Texas 1967), aff’d 389 U.S. 569, 88 S.Ct. 692, 19 L.Ed.2d 779 (1968) (ICC rejected recommendation of its examiner). . The utilities also rely upon EPA’s comments published with its amendment of the variance provisions in 40 CFR Part 423. 43 FR 40324 (Sept. 22, 1978), typographica…