I. M. AMUSEMENT CORP.

v.

OHIO

Citator

Cited By

• Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton, 413 U.S. 49 (U.S. 1973)
  …omac News Co. v. United States, 389 U. S. 47 (1967); Conner v. City of Hammond, 389 U. S. 48 (1967); Central Magazine Sales, Ltd. v. United States, [*83] 389 U. S. 50 (1967); Chance v. California, 389 U. S. 89 (1967); 1. M. Amusement Corp. v. Ohio, 389 U. S. 573 (1968); Robert-Arthur Management Corp. v. Tennessee, 389 U. S. 578 (1968); Felton v. City of Pensacola, 390 U. S. 340 (1968); Henry v. Louisiana, 392 U. S. 655 (1968); Cain v. Kentucky, supra; Bloss v. Dykema, 398 U. S. 278 (1970); Walker v. Ohio, 3…
• Huffman v. United States, 470 F.2d 386 (D.C. Cir. 1971)
  …activity,25 or to a sexual episode which, though explicit, was “so fragmentary and fleeting that only a censor’s alert would make an audience conscious that something ‘questionable’ is being portrayed.” 26 In I & M Amusements v. Ohio, 389 U.S. 573, 88 S.Ct. 690, 19 L.Ed.2d 776 (1968),27 the Court reversed a criminal conviction based on the exhibition of a film featuring “pinups” 28 and a series of scenes in which two women “at least nude to the waist” were “going through actions” which the trial judge said…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• United States v. Groner, 475 F.2d 550 (5th Cir. 1972)
  …343 (1968); Felton v. City of Pensacola, 390 U.S. 340, 88 S.Ct. 1098, 19 L.Ed.2d 1220 (1968); Robert-Arthur Management Corp. v. Tennessee ex rel. Canale, 389 U.S. 578, 88 S.Ct. 691, 19 L.Ed.2d 777 (1968); I. M. Amusement Corp. v. Ohio, 389 U.S. 573, 88 S.Ct. 690, 19 L.Ed.2d 776 (1968); Chance v. California, 389 U.S. 89, 88 S.Ct. 253, 19 L.Ed.2d 250 (1967); Central Magazine Sales, Ltd. v. United States, 389 U.S. 50, 88 S.Ct. 235, 19 L.Ed.2d 49 (1967); Conner v. City of Hammond, 389 U.S. 48, 88 S.Ct. 234, 19…

Authorities Cited

• Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476 (U.S. 1957)
• A Book Named "john Cleland's Memoirs of a Woman of Pleasure" v. Attorney General of Massachusetts, 383 U.S. 413 (U.S. 1966)
• Redrup v. New York, 386 U.S. 767 (U.S. 1967)