KIRK, GOVERNOR OF FLORIDA, ET AL.
v.
GONG ET AL.

U.S. | 1968-01-15
No. 872
389 U.S. 574 Supreme Court of the United States (1968) Caution
Cited by 3 cases

Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Kirkpatrick v. Preisler, 394 U.S. 526 (U.S. 1969)
    …of the magnitude found in the Missouri plan. In Connor v. Johnson, 386 U. S. 483 (1967), the only issue presented to this Court was whether the districting plan involved racial gerrymandering. Alton v. Tawes, 384 U. S. 315 (1966), and Kirk v. Gong, 389 U. S. 574 (1968), involved situations where the lower courts themselves had reapportioned the districts on an emergency basis, and our affirmances were based on agreement with the use of the plans in that circumstance, and not on any view that the plans in qu…
  • Brigade v. Chief OF THE Capitol Police, 421 F.2d 1090 (D.C. Cir. 1969)
  • …e hearing in Frisco simply revealed that the Commission had issued unconditional certificates by mistake. Here, the error is apparent without the need for a hearing. In Strickland Transp. Co. v. United States, 274 F.Supp. 921 (N.D.Tex.1967), aff’d, 389 U.S. 574, 88 S.Ct. 694, 19 L.Ed. 782 (1968), a three-judge district court held that the Commission need not hold hearings under 49 U.S.C. § 312(a) when correcting an order that it had mistakenly entered pursuant to a court decree. In this case, the Commissio…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw