KIRK, GOVERNOR OF FLORIDA, ET AL.
v.
GONG ET AL.
KIRK, GOVERNOR OF FLORIDA, ET AL.
GONG ET AL.
389 U.S. 574
Supreme Court of the United States (1968)
Caution
Cited by 3 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Kirkpatrick v. Preisler, 394 U.S. 526 (U.S. 1969)…of the magnitude found in the Missouri plan. In Connor v. Johnson, 386 U. S. 483 (1967), the only issue presented to this Court was whether the districting plan involved racial gerrymandering. Alton v. Tawes, 384 U. S. 315 (1966), and Kirk v. Gong, 389 U. S. 574 (1968), involved situations where the lower courts themselves had reapportioned the districts on an emergency basis, and our affirmances were based on agreement with the use of the plans in that circumstance, and not on any view that the plans in qu…
-
Brigade v. Chief OF THE Capitol Police, 421 F.2d 1090 (D.C. Cir. 1969)
-
Howard Sober, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Comm'n & United States, 628 F.2d 36 (D.C. Cir. 1980)…e hearing in Frisco simply revealed that the Commission had issued unconditional certificates by mistake. Here, the error is apparent without the need for a hearing. In Strickland Transp. Co. v. United States, 274 F.Supp. 921 (N.D.Tex.1967), aff’d, 389 U.S. 574, 88 S.Ct. 694, 19 L.Ed. 782 (1968), a three-judge district court held that the Commission need not hold hearings under 49 U.S.C. § 312(a) when correcting an order that it had mistakenly entered pursuant to a court decree. In this case, the Commissio…