NATIONAL SMALL SHIPMENTS TRAFFIC CONFERENCE, INC., ET AL.

v.

RINGSBY TRUCK LINES, INC., ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Middlewest Motor Freight Bureau v. United States, 433 F.2d 212 (8th Cir. 1970)
  …n.” New York Cent. R. Co. v. United States, 99 F.Supp. 394, 401 (D.Mass.), aff’d 342 U.S. 890, 72 S.Ct. [*222] 201, 96 L.Ed. 667 (1951) (emphasis added). See also Ringsby Truck Lines, Inc. v. United States, 263 F.Supp. 552 (D.Colo.1967), app. dis., 389 U.S. 576, 88 S.Ct. 689, 19 L.Ed.2d 775 (1968); Baltimore & O. C. T. R. Co., v. United States, 279 F.Supp. 270 (N.D.Ill.), aff’d, 389 U.S. 88, 88 S.Ct. 253, 19 L.Ed.2d 255 (1967). Due to the technicality of the concepts involved, as well as the distinct poss…
• Ringsby Truck Lines, Inc. v. United States & Interstate Commerce Comm'n, 490 F.2d 620 (10th Cir. 1973)
  …rvene in the instant action and counterclaim for restitutionary damages. Their appeal to the Supreme Court from the original three-judge decision was dismissed as moot. National Small Shipments Traffic, Conference, Inc. v. Ringsby Truck Lines, Inc., 389 U.S. 576, 88 S.Ct. 689, 19 L.Ed.2d 775. Because of the contingency provision of the second rate cancellation order, its effectiveness was stayed pending judicial disposition of the controversy. When no party pressed for trial the court, on its own motion, s…
• Port Terminal R.R. Ass'n v. The United States & Interstate Commerce Comm'n, 551 F.2d 1336 (5th Cir. 1977)
  …ion and rehearing improper and remanded to the Commission for further proceedings. Cf. Eddleman v. United States, D.Colo.1964, 229 F.Supp. 231; Ringsby Truck Lines, Inc. v. United States, D.Colo.1967, 263 F.Supp. 552, appeal dismissed as moot, 1968, 389 U.S. 576, 88 S.Ct. 689, 19 L.Ed.2d 775, appealed later 10th Cir. 1973, 490 F. 2d 620, cert. denied, 1974, 419 U.S. 833, 95 S.Ct. 59, 42 L.Ed.2d 59; see also City of Lawrence, Mass. v. C. A. B., 1 Cir. 1965, 343 F. 2d 583. Although the case now before us pres…