CHARLES EDWARD CRUMP, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 1966-11-16
Nos. 7209-7211
ALLEN, C. J., and SHANNON and HOBSON, JJ., concur.
191 So. 2d 617 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1966) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

*618PER CURIAM.

Neither the appellant nor the appellee filed briefs in this cause. However, after careful examination of the entire record and in consideration of the errors alleged by the appellant in his “assignment of errors”, we find no basis to support his allegations and further the record-on-appeal discloses no reversible error. Affirmed.

ALLEN, C. J., and SHANNON and HOBSON, JJ., concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Lungu v. Walters, 198 So. 2d 99 (Fla. 3d DCA 1967)
    …rmined that the complaint meets the requirements of the Declaratory Judgments Act, it was error to dismiss the complaint with prejudice for failure to state a cause of action. See May v. Holley, Fla.1952, 59 So. 2d 636; Crump v. State, Fla.App.1966, 191 So. 2d 617. Reversed and remanded.…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw