OSBOURNE ET AL.

v.

MISSISSIPPI VALLEY BARGE LINE CO. ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. N.Y. Tel. Co., 434 U.S. 159 (U.S. 1977)
  …iginal action or engaged in wrongdoing, are in a position to frustrate the implementation of a court order or the proper administration of justice, Mississippi Valley Barge Line Co. v. United States, 273 F. Supp. 1, 6 (ED Mo. 1967), summarily aff’d, 389 U. S. 579 (1968); Board of Education v. York, 429 F. 2d 66 (CA10 1970), cert. denied, 401 U. S. 954 (1971), and encompasses even those who have not taken any affirmative action to hinder justice. United States v. McHie, 196 F. 586 (ND Ill. 1912); Field v. Uni…
• Application of the United States In the Matter of an Order Authorizing the USE OF A PEN Register or Similar Mech. Device, 538 F.2d 956 (2d Cir. 1976)
  …ing injunctions and other writs against persons who, though not parties to the original action, may thwart the effectuation of the court’s decision. See Mississippi Valley Barge Line Co. v. United States, 273 F.Supp. 1, 6 (E.D. Mo.1967), aff’d mem., 389 U.S. 579, 88 S.Ct. 692, 19 L.Ed.2d 779 (1968). It is true that, until the recent decision of the Seventh Circuit in United States v. Illinois Bell Telephone Co., supra, the authority granted by the All Writs Act was apparently- never used to issue orders au…
• Teas v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp., 413 F.2d 1263 (5th Cir. 1969)
  …b) to make Twentieth Century a citizen of the same state as some of the plaintiffs. . See Terry v. Adams, 1953, 345 U.S. 461, 470, 73 S.Ct. 809, 97 L.Ed. 1152; Mississippi Valley Barge Line Co. v. United States, E.D.Mo.1967, 273 F.Supp. 1, 6, aff’d 389 U.S. 579, 88 S.Ct. 692, 19 L.Ed.2d 779; United States v. Wallace, N.D. Ala.1963, 218 F.Supp. 290, 292, and the many decisions there collected. . We do not necessarily foreclose Twentieth Century from terminating its personal obligations pursuant to the inte…