GOLDSTEIN, AKA PIETRARU, ET AL.

v.

COX ET AL., SURROGATES OF THE COUNTY OF NEW YORK, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Goldstein v. COX, 396 U.S. 471 (U.S. 1970)
  …Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed. This Court granted certiorari, vacated the judgment, and remanded the case to the Court of Appeals for further consideration in the light of Zschernig v. Miller, 389 U. S. 429, decided the same day. 389 U. S. 581 (1968). On remand, the Court of Appeals reversed the original order of the District Court, and remanded the case for consideration by a three-judge court. 391 F. 2d 586 (C. A. 2d Cir. 1968). [*474] Appellants then moved for summary judgment, urgin…
• Ioannou v. NEW York, 391 U.S. 604 (U.S. 1968)
  …tation of the Attorney General of New York that the movant may file a new application “to withdraw the funds deposited with the New York City Treasurer” in the light of changed circumstances. See Zschernig v. Miller, 389 U. S. 429; Goldstein v. Cox, 389 U. S. 581. Mr. Justice Douglas. Since the only changed circumstances concern the intervening decision of this Court in Zschernig v. Miller, 389 U. S. 429, and since the rationale of that decision applies to custodial statutes such as New York has as well as…
• Anghel Goldstein v. COX, 391 F.2d 586 (2d Cir. 1968)
  …udge court under 28 U.S.C. § 2281, and for a preliminary injunction, were denied and they appealed to this court. On September 27, 1967, this court affirmed in open court the order of the court below. Our decision was vacated by the Supreme Court, 389 U.S. 581, 88 S.Ct. 694, 19 L.Ed.2d 781 (1/15/68), and remanded for further consideration in light of Zschernig v. Miller, 389 U.S. 429, 88 S.Ct. 664, 19 L.Ed.2d 683 (1/15/68), in which the Court interpreted Clark v. Allen, 331 U.S. 503, 67 S.Ct. 1431, 91 L.E…