ANDERSON

v.

JOHNSON, WARDEN

Citator

Cited By

• Barber v. Page, 390 U.S. 719 (U.S. 1968)
  …nfrontation in violation of the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments. His contention was rejected by the District Court and on appeal the Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, one judge dissenting, affirmed. 381 F. 2d 479 (1966). We granted certiorari, 389 U. S. 819 (1967), to consider petitioner’s denial of confrontation claim, and we reverse. Many years ago this Court stated that “[t]he primary object of the [Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment] . . . was to prevent depositions or ex parte affidavits…
• Avco Corp. v. Aero Lodge NO. 735, 390 U.S. 557 (U.S. 1968)
  …ling that the action was within its original jurisdiction. The District Court granted respondents’ motion to dissolve the injunction issued by the Tennessee court. The Court of Appeals affirmed. 376 F. 2d 337. We granted the petition for certiorari (389 U. S. 819) because of an apparent conflict between the decision below and American Dredging Co. v. Local 25, 338 F. 2d 837, from the Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. The starting point is § 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act, 1947, 61 Stat. 156…
• In re Whittington, 391 U.S. 341 (U.S. 1968)
  …n March 15, 1967, the Supreme Court of Ohio, sua sponte, dismissed petitioner’s further appeal on the ground that it presented “no substantial constitutional question.” Petitioner then filed a petition for certiorari in this Court, which we granted, 389 U. S. 819 (1967), raising the same issues presented in the Ohio courts. Under Ohio law an adjudication that a child is a delinquent can have numerous substantial consequences. For example, once such a determination is made the Juvenile Court may place the ch…