SORENSEN

v.

SWANSON

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Previte, 648 F.2d 73 (1st Cir. 1981)
  …have held submission of a written set of instructions to the jury to be within the district court’s discretion. See, e. g., United States v. Clavey, 565 F. 2d 111 (7th Cir. 1977); United States v. Blane, 375 F. 2d 249 (6th Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 825, 88 S.Ct. 41, 19 L.Ed.2d 503 (1976). Indeed, we think this aid properly employed could well enhance juror comprehension and rationality, certainly the principal if not the sole criteria by which such measures must be evaluated.10 The choice of pro…
• Lindauer v. The Okla. City Urban Renewal Auth., 452 F.2d 117 (10th Cir. 1971)
  …courts of Oklahoma, wherein violations of the Oklahoma constitution and the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution were alleged, was rejected by the Oklahoma Supreme Court. Isaacs v. Oklahoma City, 437 P. 2d 229 (1966), cert. denied 389 U.S. 825, 88 S.Ct. 63, 19 L.Ed.2d 79. The question of the constitutionality of a statute must be substantial before there is a right to a three-judge panel. Bailey v. Patterson, 369 U.S. 31, 82 S.Ct. 589, 7 L.Ed.2d 512 (1962). The district judge to whom the…
• In re DCA Dev. Corp., 489 F.2d 43 (1st Cir. 1973)
  …evidence to the record that would indicate inadequacy of consideration. But appellant had that opportunity and simply failed to utilize it. Cf. Arkwright Mut. Ins. Co. v. Bargain City, U.S.A., Inc., [*48] 373 F. 2d 701, 706 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 825, 88 S.Ct. 63, 19 L.Ed.2d 79 (1967). Finally, appellant challenges the transfer on the ground that the referee violated Fed.R.Civ.P. 52(a) by failing to include sufficiently detailed findings of fact in his April 20 order of approval. It acknowledge…