BLAIR MANUFACTURING CO.

v.

HAMPTON ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• LEE v. PLY*GEM Indus., Inc., 593 F.2d 1266 (D.C. Cir. 1979)
  …e. g., Hines v. D’Artois, 531 F. 2d 726, 729 (5th Cir. 1976); Chronicle Pub. Co. v. National Broadcasting Co., 294 F. 2d 744, 746 (9th Cir. 1961); Ephraim Freightways, Inc. v. Red Ball Motor Freight, Inc., 376 F. 2d 40, 41 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 829, 88 S.Ct. 92, 19 L.Ed.2d 87 (1967). . E. g., Baltimore Contractors, Inc. v. Bodinger, supra note 15, 348 U.S. at 184, 75 S.Ct. at 254, 99 L.Ed. at 240 (“[t]he reliance on the analogy of equity power to enjoin proceedings in other courts has element…
• E. W. Bliss Co. v. Struthers-Dunn, Inc., 408 F.2d 1108 (8th Cir. 1969)
  …ology or being prevented from employing the individual defendants. The effect of either alternative is to afford Bliss unwarranted protection against legitimate competition. In Hampton v. Blair Mfg. Co., 374 F. 2d 969, 973 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 829, 88 S.Ct. 87, 19 L.Ed.2d 85 (1967), on consideration of a permanent injunction protecting trade secrets, we disapproved of “broad language [which] would prohibit the use of much ordinary and uncomplicated stock equipment such as wheels, axles, frame…
• York Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc. v. Chrysler Credit Corp., 447 F.2d 786 (5th Cir. 1971)
  …lved it against Chrysler, and to any extent that it was not presented below, we cannot consider it on appeal. Hanley v. Chrysler Motors, 433 F. 2d 708 (10th Cir. 1970); Pan-American Life Ins. Co. v. Alvarez, 374 F. 2d 92 (5th Cir. 1967), cert. den., 389 U.S. 829, 88 S.Ct. 89, 19 L.Ed.2d 85. D. Sufficiency of the Evidence. Chrysler Motors finally urges that there was insufficient evidence to support the jury’s verdict of a violation of the Dealers Act. Although not necessarily compelling, the evidence prov…