AMERICAN INVESTORS FUND, INC.

v.

FOGEL ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (15 total)

• Alfred Dunhill of London, Inc. v. Republic OF Cuba, 425 U.S. 682 (U.S. 1976)
  …and that the interventors were therefore entitled to payment for postintervention shipments. F. Palicio y Compania, S. A. v. Brush, 256 F. Supp. 481, 486-490 (SDNY 1966), aff’d, 375 F. 2d 1011 (CA2), cert. denied sub nom. Brush v. Republic of Cuba, 389 U. S. 830 (1967). It is quite clear that that result was correct, and that it would have been no different had the intervened firms been owned by United States citizens. Banco Nacional de Cuba v. Sabbatino, 376 U. S. 398 (1964). [*717] Since the date of int…

  ← 1 / 3 →
• United States ex rel. George Hart v. Davenport, 478 F.2d 203 (3d Cir. 1973)
  …tity of parties by whom they are engaged.’ It is of course to the advantage of the convicted defendant to seek leniency by aiding the State in its pursuit of his employer. State v. DeStasio, 49 N.J. 247, 256-258 [229 A. 2d 636] (1967), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 830, 88 S.Ct. 96, 19 L.Ed.2d 89 (1967). It is the duty of the defendant’s attorney to advise him of that opportunity. An attorney is hardly well situated to discharge that duty when he has agreed to look to the syndicate for the payment of his fee. A c…
• Alonso Menendez v. Saks & Co., 485 F.2d 1355 (2d Cir. 1973)
  …owners against the importer were held in abeyance pending a determination of these rights and then were adjusted to conform to the Palicio decision, which was affirmed by this court. 375 F. 2d 1011 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, Brush v. Republic of Cuba, 389 U.S. 830, 88 S.Ct. 95, 19 L.Ed.2d 88 (1967). After Palicio was decided, the interventors (including the Republic of Cuba) were permitted to intervene as additional parties plaintiff in the owners’ actions against the importers. Ignoring their previous agree…

  ← 1 / 2 →