SUAREZ

v.

FLORIDA

Citator

Cited By

• McNAMARA v. State, 357 So. 2d 410 (Fla. 1978)
  …inferences and deductions derived therefrom in a manner most favorable to sustain the trial court’s ruling. Cf. Glas v. State, 329 So. 2d 341 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1976), Rodriguez v. State, 189 So. 2d 656 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1966), cert. den. Suarez v. Florida, 389 U.S. 848, 88 S.Ct. 66, 19 L.Ed.2d 116. We find that under the circumstances present in the instant cause, the officers had probable cause sufficient to justify the frisking of appellant for their own safety. Cf. Wilson v. State, 324 So. 2d 700 (Fla. 4th DCA…
• Hernan Perez v. State, 536 So. 2d 359 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988)
  …as a factfinder. Wasko v. State, 505 So. 2d 1314, 1316 (Fla.1987); DeConingh v. State, 433 So. 2d 501 (Fla.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1005, 104 S.Ct. 995, 79 L.Ed.2d 228 (1984); Rodriguez v. State, 189 So. 2d 656 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 848, 88 S.Ct. 66, 19 L.Ed.2d 116 (1967). Review of the [*361] record shows that the case was based on sharply conflicting testimony on the consent question,2 which was solely for the trial judge and then the jury — not this court — to resolve. Tibbs v.…
• Efrain T. Suarez v. State, 220 So. 2d 442 (Fla. 3d DCA 1969)
  …judgment of conviction in Rodriguez v. State, Fla.App.1966, 189 So. 2d 656.4 The Supreme Court of Florida denied certiorari in Suarez v. State, Fla. 1967, 196 So. 2d 923. The Supreme Court of the United States denied certiorari in Suarez v. Florida, 389 U.S. 848, 88 S.Ct. 66, 19 L.Ed.2d 116 (1967). He has had his day in court. For the foregoing reasons we affirm the order denying the appellant relief under Rule 1.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Pro- , cedure. Affirmed. . Suarez was one of the appellants i…