CUSTER CHANNEL WING CORP. ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (33 total)

• South Dakota v. Neville, 459 U.S. 553 (U.S. 1983)
  …a blood test have found no violation of the privilege against self-incrimination. Many courts, following the lead of Justice Traynor’s opinion for the California Supreme Court in People v. Sudduth, 65 Cal. 2d 543, 421 P. 2d 401 (1966), cert. denied, 389 U. S. 850 (1967), have reasoned that refusal to submit is a physical act rather than a communication and for this reason is not protected by the [*561] privilege.11 As Justice Traynor explained more fully in the companion case of People v. Ellis, 65 Cal. 2d 5…
• Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Murphy, 626 F.2d 633 (9th Cir. 1980)
  …ble an informed investment decision. A purchaser of unregistered stock must be shown to have been in a position to acquire similar information about the issuer. United States v. Custer Channel Wing Corp., 376 F. 2d 675, 678 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 850, 88 S.Ct. 38, 19 L.Ed.2d 119 (1967) (footnote omitted). Included in this information is the use of investor funds, the amount of direct and indirect commissions, and accurate financial statements. Intertie supplied almost none of this required inf…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• United States & Interstate Commerce Comm'n v. The Greyhound Corp. & Greyhound Lines, Inc., 508 F.2d 529 (7th Cir. 1974)
  …ess is violated by re [*533] quiring a person in this position to be more than normally careful in his future conduct.” United States v. Custer Channel Wing Corp., 247 F.Supp. 481, 496 (D.Md.1965), aff’d, 376 F. 2d 675 (4th Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 850, 88 S.Ct. 38, 19 L.Ed.2d 119. Ill We turn now to the specific paragraphs of the order as to which Greyhound was found to be in criminal contempt. A Paragraph 1 of the order requires: “that Greyhound show Mt. Hood schedules in Greyhound folders o…