THERESA C. FRAZIER, APPELLANT,
v.
ARCHIE T. FRAZIER, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 1966-11-15
No. H-449
WIGGINTON, Acting C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD K., and SACK, JJ., concur.
191 So. 2d 865 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1966) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a final decree of divorce, granted to the appellee-husband. Appellant contends that a divorce should not have been granted to the husband but that her complaint for separate maintenance should have been granted. She also challenges the adequacy of the allowance of alimony, child support and attorney’s fees, as well as the failure of the court to require the husband to maintain in effect an insurance policy as security for the child support and alimony payments.

On all these issues the evidence was in conflict, and appellant has failed clearly to demonstrate that the Chancellor abused his discretion. Accordingly the decree appealed from is affirmed.

WIGGINTON, Acting C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD K., and SACK, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Lovett v. Lovett, 194 So. 2d 916 (Fla. 2d DCA 1967)
    …ance of alimony and child support. The evidence was in conflict on all of these issues. Since the appellant has failed to clearly show that the chancellor abused his discretion, the decree appealed from is affirmed. Frazier v. Frazier, Fla.App.1966, 191 So. 2d 865; Lauray v. Lauray, Fla.App.1966, 181 So. 2d 670; and Clutter v. Clutter, Fla.App.1965, 171 So. 2d 544. The appellant’s attorney has petitioned this court for attorney fees for services rendered before this court, which we grant in the sum of Three…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw