WILLIAMS

v.

CALIFORNIA ADULT AUTHORITY ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Carlini v. State, 521 So. 2d 254 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988)
  …ens, dated June 16, 1982.) Therefore, we merely quash the insufficient service made as to these two de [*258] fendants; Plaintiffs may attempt again to serve them with process. Richardson v. Ingram, Corp., 374 F. 2d 502 (3d Cir., 1967); cert. denied 389 U.S. 866, 88 S.Ct. 134, 19 L.Ed.2d 139 (1967). (footnote omitted). Moore, in paragraph 26.56[6], provides a reason for not placing the burden of volunteering information upon the defendant: Despite a few early cases to the contrary, it is clear that disco…
• Granville v. Hunt, 411 F.2d 9 (5th Cir. 1969)
  …See also Tyree v. Smith, E.D.Tenn. 1968, 289 F.Supp. 174, 178; Friedman v. Younger, C.D.Calif. 1968, 282 F.Supp. 710, 713; O'Hara v. Mattix, W.D.Mich. 1966, 255 F.Supp. 540, 542; cf. Williams v. Dunbar, 9 Cir. 1967, 377 F. 2d 505, 506, cert. denied, 389 U.S. 866, 88 S.Ct. 131, 19 L.Ed.2d 137; Duzynski v. Nosal, 7 Cir. 1963, 324 F. 2d 924. Clearly the district court was correct in dismissing the appellant’s complaint for failure to state a cause of action. If we stretched constructional liberality beyond it…
• Menechino v. Oswald, 430 F.2d 403 (2d Cir. 1970)
  …339 F. 2d 973 (7th Cir. 1965); Mead v. California Adult Authority, 415 F. 2d 767 (9th Cir. 1969). See also Dunn v. California Dep’t of Corrections, 401 F. 2d 340 (9th Cir. 1968) (dictum); Williams v. Dunbar, 377 F. 2d 505 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 866, 88 S.Ct. 131, 19 L.Ed.2d 137 (1967); Earnest v. Willingham, 406 F. 2d 681 (10th Cir. 1969); Cotner v. United States, 409 F. 2d 853 (10th Cir. 1969); United States ex rel. Halprin v. Parker, 418 F. 2d 313 (3d Cir. 1969). In accord is the recent una…