TOLES

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• State v. Drayton, 226 So. 2d 469 (Fla. 2d DCA 1969)
  …case has concluded that Brady and the Fourteenth Amendment necessitate pretrial disclosure of evidence favorable to the accused without some predicate first being established. See United States v. Tomaiolo, 2d Cir. 1967, 378 F. 2d 26, cert. denied, 389 U.S. 886, 88 S.Ct. 159, 19 L.Ed.2d 184; United States v. Wolfson, S.D.N.Y.1968, 289 F.Supp. 903; United States v. Westmoreland, S.D.Ind. 1967, 41 F.R.D. 419; United States v. Cobb, S.D.N.Y.1967, 271 F.Supp. 159; United States v. Curry, N.D.Ill.1967, 278 F.Su…
• Bailey v. United States, 389 F.2d 305 (D.C. Cir. 1967)
  …ntly stolen articles is much stronger here than it was in Goodwin, and is sufficiently strong, with the other circumstances pointing toward guilt, to require affirmance. Cf. Norman v. United States, 126 U.S.App.D.C. 387, 379 F. 2d 164, cert. denied, 389 U.S. 886, 88 S.Ct. 167, 19 L.Ed.2d 186 (1967). (3) Self-incrimination. Appellant Frye’s attorney apparently intended to put his client on the stand at the hearing on his motion to suppress. He declined to do so, however, when the District Court judge ruled…
• United States v. Harris, 458 F.2d 670 (5th Cir. 1972)
  …nity to impeach Johnson was substantially prejudiced under Brady or Dutton by the government’s failure to produce Johnson's statement and its alleged discrepancy prior to trial. See United States v. Tomaiolo, 2 Cir. 1967, 378 F. 2d 26, cert. denied, 389 U.S. 886, 88 S.Ct. 159, 19 L.Ed.2d 184. Also under Dutton appellants assert that the trial court granted too much discretion to the prosecutor concerning disclosure,4 and that the trial judge should have reviewed the Johnson statement in camera to ascertain…