FRANK IX & SONS VIRGINIA CORP.

v.

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE

Citator

Cited By (12 total)

• Garrett v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, 513 F.2d 1056 (D.C. Cir. 1975)
  …2 U.S. App.D.C. 218, 221-223, 407 F. 2d 681, 684-685 (1968); Herbert Harvey, Inc. v. NLRB, 128 U.S.App.D.C. 162, 164-165, 385 F. 2d 684, 686-687 (1967) (concurring opinion); NLRB v. Campbell Soup Co., 378 F. 2d 259, 262 n.4 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 900, 88 S.Ct. 218, 19 L.Ed.2d 217 (1967); cases cited note 26, infra. . Herbert Harvey, Inc. v. NLRB, supra note 23, 128 U.S.App.D.C. at 164, 385 F. 2d at 686; Burinskas v. NLRB, supra note 23, 123 U.S. App.D.C. at 148, 357 F. 2d at 827. . Melody Musi…
• The United States v. The N. Paiute Nation, 393 F.2d 786 (Ct. Cl. 1968)
  …*. “[T]he right of sovereignty over discovered land was always subject to the right of use and occupancy and enjoyment of the land by Indians living on the land.” Sac and Fox Tribe v. United States, supra, [383 F. 2d 991, 179 Ct.Cl. 8, cert. denied 389 U.S. 900, 88 S.Ct. 220, 19 L.Ed.2d 217 (1967)]. * * * In Lipan, however, we did not deal with the question of whether the prior Spanish or Mexican sovereigns specifically intended to extinguish aboriginal Indian rights in subsurface minerals. In Lipan, Id.…
• Mason v. The United States, 461 F.2d 1364 (Ct. Cl. 1972)
  …d 544 (1964); Seneca Nation v. United States, 173 Ct.Cl. 917, 925 (1965); Navajo Tribe v. United States, 364 F. 2d 320, 322-323, 176 Ct.Cl. 502, 507-508 (1966); Sac and Fox Tribe v. United States, 383 F. 2d 991, 1001, 179 Ct.Cl. 8, 27, cert. denied, 389 U.S. 900, 88 S.Ct. 220, 19 L.Ed.2d 217 (1967); Gila River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community v. United States, 427 F. 2d 1194, 1198, 190 Ct.Cl. 790, 797-798, cert. denied, 400 U.S. 819, 91 S.Ct. 37, 27 L.Ed.2d 47 (1970); cf. Seminole Nation v. United States, 316…