SAUNDERS

v.

KROPP, WARDEN; AND WOOLLASTON V. PENNSYLVANIA

Citator

Cited By

• Pickering v. Bd. OF Educ. OF Twp. High Sch. Dist. 205, 391 U.S. 563 (U.S. 1968)
  …urt. 36 Ill. 2d 568, 225 N. E. 2d 1 (1967). We noted probable jurisdiction of appellant’s claim that the Illinois statute permitting his dismissal on the facts of this case was unconstitutional as applied under the First and Fourteenth Amendments.1 389 U. S. 925 (1967). For the reasons detailed below we agree that appellant’s rights to freedom of speech were violated and we reverse. I. In February of 1961 the appellee Board of Education asked the voters of the school district to approve a bond issue to ra…
• Levy v. La. Through the Charity Hosp. of La. at New Orleans Bd. of Administrators, 391 U.S. 68 (U.S. 1968)
  …scourages bringing children into the world out of wedlock.” 192 So. 2d 193, 195. The Supreme Court of Louisiana denied certiorari. 250 La. 25, 193 So. 2d 530. The case is here on appeal (28 U. S. C. § 1257 (2)) ; and we noted probable jurisdiction, 389 U. S. 925, the statute as construed having been sustained against challenge under both the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment. We start from the premise that illegitimate children are not “nonpersons.” They are humans, live,…
• Meehan v. Macy, 392 F.2d 822 (D.C. Cir. 1968)
  …499, 55 Cal.Rptr. 401, 421 P. 2d 409 (1966) (in bank); Fort v. Civil Service Com., 61 Cal.2d 331, 38 Cal.Rptr. 625, 392 P. 2d 385 (1964); Pickering v. Board of Educ., 36 Ill.2d 568, 225 N.E. 2d 1, 7 (dissenting opinion), probable jurisdiction noted, 389 U.S. 925, 88 S.Ct. 291, 19 L.Ed.2d 276 (1967). . J.A. 81, 102-103. The language of Justice Holmes appears in McAuliffe v. City of New Bedford, 155 Mass. 216, 220, 29 N.E. 517 (1892). . See, e. g., United States v. Robel, 389 U.S. 258, 88 S.Ct. 419, 19 L.Ed…