STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
v.
LOUIS MURPHY CONNELLY, A/K/A LEWIS MURPHY CONNELLY, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 1966-11-23
No. 7277
ALLEN, C. J., and LILES and PIERCE, JJ., concur.
192 So. 2d 62 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1966) Caution
Cited by 7 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See State v. McLain, 150 Fla. 592, 8 So.2d 392 (1942).

ALLEN, C. J., and LILES and PIERCE, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Lewis v. State, 296 So. 2d 575 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974)
    …roperty of another. When the police requested that other for permission to enter the trailer, such permission was granted. The lesson of Moore v. Wainwright, 248 So. 2d 262 (Fla.App.1971); Gore v. State, 237 So. 2d 243 (Fla.App.1970); Mims v. State, 192 So. 2d 62 (Fla.App.1966); State v. Dees, 280 So. 2d 51 (Fla.App.1973), cert. denied, Fla., 291 So. 2d 195, and United States v. Matlock, 415 U.S. 164, 94 S.Ct. 988, 39 L.Ed.2d 242, is that a warrantless search and seizure of property located on or in the prem…
  • State v. Patterson, 252 So. 2d 398 (Fla. 2d DCA 1971)
    …either the search or the seizure. Slater v. State, Fla.1956, 90 So. 2d 453; Range v. State, Fla.App.1963, 156 So. 2d 534; Cacciatore v. State, Fla.App.1966, 186 So. 2d 32; Talavera v. State, Fla.App.1966, 186 So. 2d 811; Mims v. State, Fla.App.1966, 192 So. 2d 62. Furthermore, it is doubtful if Rebecca, admittedly not the owner of the car, could object to the search. Alexander v. State, Fla.App.1959, 107 So. 2d 261; Gispert v. State, Fla.App.1960, 118 So. 2d 596; State v. Smith, Fla.App.1960, 118 So. 2d 792…
  • Osgood v. State, 192 So. 2d 64 (Fla. 2d DCA 1966)
    …e. Appellant-Defendant below brings this appeal from judgment and sentence pursu [*65] ant to a jury verdict of guilty of the crime of breaking and entering with intent to commit a misdemeanor. This is a companion case with Mims v. State, Fla.App., 192 So. 2d 62, which is being reversed for a new trial, and the facts are similar with the exception that in this case, the attorney for this Defendant was not permitted to cross examine a proffered witness out of the presence of the jury! Also, the Defendant’s a…

Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw