ELLIOTT

v.

CALIFORNIA

Citator

Cited By

• Bernie Ludwig v. State, 215 So. 2d 898 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968)
  …We think the requisite “reason for crediting the source of the information” may be inferred from the allegations in the affidavit and the other circumstances of a given case. Cf. Wooten v. United States, 380 F. 2d 230 (5th Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 942, 88 S.Ct. 302, 19 L.Ed.2d 294. The next point concerns the legality of the seizure of the property not mentioned in the search warrant. As a general rule, law enforcement officers may not lawfully seize property unless it is specifically described…
• United States v. Ashley, 569 F.2d 975 (5th Cir. 1978)
  …ething more substantial than a casual rumor circulating in the underworld or the defendants’ general reputation. See Spinelli v. United States, supra, 393 U.S. at 416, 89 S.Ct. 584; Wooten v. United States, 380 F. 2d 230, 232 (5 Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 942, 88 S.Ct. 302, 19 L.Ed.2d 294 (1967). (2) Fossum’s Reliability. Under this prong of the Aguilar test, we must determine if there is sufficient information to infer that the informant is a reliable or trustworthy person. While there is always some d…
• Tillery v. United States, 411 F.2d 644 (5th Cir. 1969)