MENDOZA

v.

CALIFORNIA

Citator

Cited By

• Fornash v. Marshall, 686 F.2d 1179 (6th Cir. 1982)
  …69) (search made after car moved to police station not unreasonable); United States v. Powell, 407 F. 2d 582 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 966, 89 S.Ct. 2113, 23 L.Ed.2d 753 (1969); United States v. Dento, 382 F. 2d 361 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 944, 88 S.Ct. 307, 19 L.Ed.2d 299 (1967) (search conducted twenty minutes after arrest after car moved to police station was “substantially contemporaneous” with the arrest and therefore not unreasonable.) We conclude that under the search and seizure…
• United States v. Macio Singleton, 759 F.2d 176 (D.C. Cir. 1985)
  …rendered in a prior trial that evidence was [*183] admissible. On appeal, the circuit court held that the decision whether the evidence was admissible was for the trial judge at the new trial to make. 380 F. 2d 325, 326 n. 1 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 944, 88 S.Ct. 308, 19 L.Ed.2d 302 (1967). See also United States v. Akers, 702 F. 2d 1145, 1148 & n. 8 (D.C.Cir.1983). Unlike Dovico, our case involves a district judge ruling on a question previously determined by the appellate court. Although the dis…